Sometimes the stars align. This is one of those times.
Not long after the Billing-xpress (Billing-xpress) announced that Ben & Jerry’s ice cream tested positive for glyphosate, the key ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller, another story broke—one that validates the importance of finding glyphosate, even at low doses, in any food.
According to internal Monsanto documents, Monsanto forced the retraction of a critical long-term study, first published in 2012, showing that very low doses of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide—lower than those detected in Ben & Jerry’s ice cream—caused serious liver and kidney damage in rats. Shortly before the study was retracted, the editor of the journal began working for Monsanto, under a consulting contract. (The study, led by G.E. Séralini, was in 2014, by the Environmental Sciences Europe).
Monsanto company officials weren’t too pleased when their internal emails went public. The New York Times reported that one Monsanto scientists wrote this in an in 2001:
“If somebody came to me and said they wanted to test Roundup I know how I would react — with serious concern.”
The email was uncovered in what the Huffington Post reported are more than 75 documents, including and discussions about payments to scientists, which were posted for early Tuesday morning by attorneys who are suing Monsanto on behalf of people alleging Roundup caused them or their family members to become ill with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of blood cancer.
Monsanto told the New York Times “it was outraged by the documents’ release.
But we are the ones who should be outraged. By Monsanto knowingly selling a toxic product, and covering it up by attacking credible independent scientists. By government agencies that allowed, and possibly even in the cover-ups and attacks. And by companies like Ben & Jerry’s that profess great concern for naatural ingredients, health, the environment, the climate and “social responsibility,” while excusing themselves from having to live up to those promises.